Are you refering to a cue that fits YOUR preferences as one of the better cues?
Would other players not think it was not such a great cue because their preferences are different.
Is there one cue that almost everyone would play with and call it a great cue?
SouthWest is one example of a cue considered by many to be a great cue.
That is why some makers copy that style right down to the joint pin and ring work.
But there are also some that dont like the Southwest feel or style and dont consider them to be all that good.
Are they ignorant or just inexperienced?
Steev ...If a cue maker throws away more than half his shaft wood he needs to find a new supplier.
I never said anything about player preferences making them ignorant or inexperienced. And by ignorant I am not meaning stupid. I mean they aren't well educated or knowledgeable. The word ignorant sounds bad when it's actually nothing negative.
You are correct, some cues are more popular than others because of player style. If the majority of players have a play style that fits a certain cue, then that cue is going to be in higher demand & more popular than other cues. The demand is high because it fits a whole bunch of players' play style. If you, as a cuemaker, only play one pocket or your style of playing other games is mild & soft stroked, then your cues are naturally going to reflect it. The only people who are going to really like your cues are players who play with a similar style. If you have a minority style, then your cues are going to have a minority demand. If you have a majority style, then your cues are likely going to have a majority demand. The other factor to this dynamic is the play level of the builder. If you aren't very good at playing or know a whole lot about the science of the game, then you probably aren't going to be able to offer the majority of players something they think is great. If you just put cues together using good materials, tight construction, producing a solid cue, it's not enough. You have to know why you are doing certain things and from that you can tune your techniques to achieve the hit & playability you want the cue to have. If you don't know, then you are going to think a solid cue should be as good as any other cue and justify it to yourself as the buyers being ignorant instead of you. You'll blame it on hype instead of coming to terms with the fact that there's something you don't know about cuemaking. I hate to say it, but the fact is some builders have what it takes & others do not. The demand & success reflect it. People buying cues aren't idiots. They aren't spending their hard earned money on foundless hype. To say they do is insulting to them and it's severely arrogant to believe that a cuemaker knows more about how a cue should play than a player does.
That's how I see the cue world. I'm not attempting to piss anybody off or insult anyone. I'm just calling it like I see it, as both a builder and a player in no particular order. For me, building cues has made me a better player. And being a better player has made me better at cuemaking. We should all be striving to be the best we can, never settling. And if we aren't evolving as players, it's hard to evolve at building. To study one is to study the other, like peanut butter & jelly. Peanut butter sandwiches are good. hey're a whole lot better with jelly. And likewise.
If you want to know how to achieve a particular feel, you buy several different types of wood & you experiment with several types of construction techniques. Record your findings & start looking for patterns. Same with performance. Try different tips, different ferrules, different construction techniques, different tapers, etc. Record your findings & look for patterns. Learn your woods & what makes a good piece as opposed to a bad one. It's important to play with all of these seemingly endless combinations and pay close attention to the results. It takes time. It's time spent learning & not building customer cues, which apparently isn't popular with a lot of builders. It's things that can't be learned online, only in the shop & on the table. Fact is, there's reasons big names get their names beyond the phenominom of hype. Hype isn't a cause, it's a byproduct, the emmissions. Again, just the way I see things.