I like SVB, Schmidt and Corey (my top 3).
what about archer?
I like SVB, Schmidt and Corey (my top 3).
what about archer?
Who is the best pure shotmaker in America? I was told that Strickand dominated in 9 ball because he could make the first initial tough shot after the break where others played safe.
So how about we try the TAR format idea of having a 4 man tourney each putting in $3000 and play in a format where you can push after the break 9 ball but after that it is a foul on all misses. No safeties. Just exciting banks and thin cuts down the entire table that we never get the joy of viewing in normal rotation formats.
This type of game might be right up Earl's alley. Who would you think would win in this format? Archer? Deuel? Schmidt? I would definitely pay to see this and I bet others would too.
You would have to give each of them the EXACT same layouts as well as consider perhaps 20 breaks, picking the best break for each of them. Then you would have to consider how they choose to run out the table as well as what a "perfect" leave is...Sounds like a LOT of numbers and calculations to consider just to determine who is the "best".
There is a really hot blonde at Firehouse in Athens, GA that makes the best shots, hands down.
Who is the best pure shotmaker in America? I was told that Strickand dominated in 9 ball because he could make the first initial tough shot after the break where others played safe.
If Earl was the greatest shotmaker, then please answer me why he seems to choke so much at crucial moments? I am not anti Earl, these are just my observations.
Who is the best pure shotmaker in America? I was told that Strickand dominated in 9 ball because he could make the first initial tough shot after the break where others played safe.
So how about we try the TAR format idea of having a 4 man tourney each putting in $3000 and play in a format where you can push after the break 9 ball but after that it is a foul on all misses. No safeties. Just exciting banks and thin cuts down the entire table that we never get the joy of viewing in normal rotation formats.
This type of game might be right up Earl's alley. Who would you think would win in this format? Archer? Deuel? Schmidt? I would definitely pay to see this and I bet others would too.
Strickland was so good because of his great stroke and his control of the cueball.
But, IMO, he is NOT the best pure shotmaker by far - because he looks at the cueball last when he shoots. I have seen him miss an abnormally high number of long shots - it seems - and even short shorts (the Mosconi Cup). But, mybe my view of shotmaking is different from your yours. If Earl was the greatest shotmaker, then please answer me why he seems to choke so much at crucial moments? I am not anti Earl, these are just my observations.