Makes perfect sense to me. Sounds like it was the place to be, and he made it work to everybody's benefit. Great job and thanks for doing it, Jay 

The one pocket challenge was the standard one pocket shoot-out proposition. Pick a pocket, break the balls as you want, and shoot to your pocket until you miss. Do 5 racks of that, and your score is your total. There are a few details like what to do on a scratch on the break.Neil said:I'm a little behind lately- just what did the challenge consist of? And what was the high run in 14.1?
Bob Jewett said:My recollection of the final night of the one pocket challenge are different from Jay's.
renard said:Sounds good to me, I have no problem with it; and no participant seems to be screaming either. This is all Shakespeare...Much ado about nothing.
jay helfert said:Gabe's 60 was a remarkable achievement, and I won't be taking anything away from it here. As far as I'm concerned, you could have let everyone in the entire One Pocket tournament take a swing at it (including Efren) and no one would beat that score. His 60 compares with a pro golfer shooting a 59! IMHO
I went first to the AZ room, and the guys in there were great and agreed to let us use one table. The only problem was all the spectators who were sweating it. So I ran into the tournament room and matches were still underway. Everywhere but on the TV table, which is one that I had been using most every night for the Ring Ten Ball game. It was open, and there was plenty of room for people to watch. I made a snap decision to finish the Challenge there. It was an identical table to the one we had been using, except it had newer cloth and hotter lighting. I never considered that I was making a mistake. I thought it would be a great place to finish the Challenge.
So I returned to the original room and informed all the players that we would be moving to the TV table. I explained that we had been asked to leave this room immediately. No one said a word in complaint! They just wanted the turns they had paid for. And about 1 AM, off we went to finish up. Corey, Alex, Cliff, Gabe and a few others fired away until 7 AM. There were a couple of scores over 40 (Alex had a 46), and then Gabe shot his spectacular 60. He just played perfect, broke good and ran the balls like a genius. I watched the whole thing. He strung together five good innings, which is EXTREMELY hard to do.
Mika even came down and we gave him three tries to try to top Gabe. He couldn't get to 40. All the players agreed that the TV table broke better, but that was about it. The pockets were the same as were the rails. I refuse to apologize for running an event which was so well received by everyone. There are things I can do to make it better next year. And yes, mistakes were made. Greg has assured me that next year, we will have our own room. This year was an experiment, and it worked out great. Gabe won $1,500 and we paid out another $1,500 to the next three players. The added money all came from people at AZ, so we can be proud of this event. Next year, I think we can expect some added money from Diamond as well. It should be bigger and better in 2009. Thanks again to all of you who contributed.
And thanks for listening to my side of the story.
Bob Jewett said:The one pocket challenge was the standard one pocket shoot-out proposition. Pick a pocket, break the balls as you want, and shoot to your pocket until you miss. Do 5 racks of that, and your score is your total. There are a few details like what to do on a scratch on the break.
The high runs at 14.1 were posted by Marop in another thread:
Immonen 147
Petroni 140
Feijen 130
Deuel 107
Schmidt 100
Hohmann 98
Souquet 92
Appleton 73
Feijen had two other runs over 100. Both Immonen's and Petroni's runs were on the back table which seemed to play quite a bit tougher than the front table in the Drinkwater Room.
My recollection of the final night of the one pocket challenge are different from Jay's.
ribdoner said:Substance? Sour grapes??
nfty9er said:Now I ask you did he let anyone else go out there and try it? No.
jay helfert said:Bob Jewett informed me that I had to finish up in a few minutes because he was going to lock up the room. Duh? What??
jay helfert said:And thanks for listening to my side of the story.
Scott Lee said:Jay...There's ALWAYS another side to the story, and usually the sour grapes stories come up first, before the real information comes out. You and Steve put on an awesome event, and when put in a pinch (instead of having to refund entry fees), you jumped in and secured a great place to finish the OP Challenge, where there was plenty of room for people to watch. IMO there's no such thing as an EASY Diamond table. Just the design makes them tough to play on, compared to some other brands. Gabe put on a OP clinic to come up with a 60 under the gun. Congrats to him, and congrats to you and Steve, for a great event that was enjoyed by a LOT of players (including a ton of us who were only able to follow the progress here, because we couldn't be there)! Nice job!![]()
Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com
I dont' think you have anything to apologize for. It looks like everyone who was in contention had a shot on that table. And that's what one of the leading participants of the challenge told me as well, after the rumor mill started up. Some people mistakenly have been led to believe that Gabe and only Gabe shot on that table. I thought this had been unsubstantiated pretty much immediately.jay helfert said:So I returned to the original room and informed all the players that we would be moving to the TV table. I explained that we had been asked to leave this room immediately. No one said a word in complaint! They just wanted the turns they had paid for. And about 1 AM, off we went to finish up. Corey, Alex, Cliff, Gabe and a few others fired away until 7 AM. There were a couple of scores over 40 (Alex had a 46), and then Gabe shot his spectacular 60. He just played perfect, broke good and ran the balls like a genius. I watched the whole thing. He strung together five good innings, which is EXTREMELY hard to do.
Mika even came down and we gave him three tries to try to top Gabe. He couldn't get to 40. All the players agreed that the TV table broke better, but that was about it.