freddy the beard said:
I should have been more clear in my initial post. This is not about denying little Johnny his free autograph. The players will still sign autographs -- if they feel like it -- on paper, programs etc. They will not sign PRODUCTS OR SOUVENIRS without an endorsement commission -- and why should they? An Ivan Roderiguez baseball glove aint free, and he gets his cut for his replicated signature and endorsement. These are like mini-endorsements, and a way for the players to make a buck.
the Beard
Freddy,
I just got back home and wanted to add a few things.
The above quoted remarks sure do convey a different picture than what was first posted. And that's not a cut. It's good that your proposal is easier to understand now.
Davis Uwate said this..."Freddy, a good sample of your target market is right here on AZB. They are telling you how well this will go over."
In post # 24, I had several other suggestions, one of which was if you want to help the pros, why not start a new tour? Or find new sponsorship in the corporate world? Then they could have the big money that we would like to see them compete for. Wouldn't these things bring more help on a larger scale than collecting fees for autographs? Our sport is about as popular as Pro Bowling. Or Pro Rodeo. We have a very small but very dedicated fan base. Can you imagine a proposal like this going over in some other sports not covered by ESPN's SportsCenter?
I never knew this was an issue with the pros. Again, in my previous post, almost all of them seemed more than happy and very flattered that people wanted them to sign a photo. It would humble me if someone asked me to simply sign my name to something. The whole process, including some small chit-chat takes what, 1 minute?
One thing for sure that the fans at the pro tourneys love is mingling with the great players they watch play and read about. But, if the fan support of some of the tournaments dry up, as MLB fans did when MLB went on strike, do you think this would cause more promoters to also fold? And then there's less money to go around. Poker has all but killed big money being easy pickin's on the road anymore.
Did anybody consult with Allen Hopkins? I am curious as to his thoughts on having the pros at his Super Billiard Expo take the propsed stance.
Going back to Dave Uwate's remarks, here is the die hard and core fan base of pool, as exampled by the posters here. Judging by the over all tone of the replies, how do you think this is going to go over?
One more thing, who's going to oversee this new venue? Who fronts the logistics, record keeping and operating costs? Will this trinkle down to the Viking Tour, Joss Tour, Blaze, etc? Are those promoters on board? At what point is a fee demanded? Does BJ Ussery or Brian Gregg or Truman Hogue have the same status as Daulton, Strickland and Archer?
This seems to me like the old fashioned wildcat strikes that the UMW or steelworkers tried. Are all the pros on board? What about the ones that say "No way.? Are they banned like the UPA banned some players?
Whatever happens, I'm still looking forward to the release of your DVD's and I'm hoping that you'll pen another sequal to your first two books, which were two of my all time favorite pool reads by the way. I still look forward to hearing you commentate on Accu-Stats and I will always be interested in you opining here and at 1Pocket.org. I just disagree with you on this new idea. It should be up to each player and each fan to dictate the terms of any encounter.
Was it really that broke that it needed fixing?